In the architecture and design world, the distinction made by calling a professional a "woman architect", raises significant questions about biases within the industry. Despite architecture and interior design having a 1:1 gender ratio, this labelling underscores a pervasive form of sexism. Why, in an age where gender roles in professions are increasingly blurred, do we feel the need to qualify an architect's expertise with their gender?
Astronauts and lawyers, doctors and scientists, regardless of gender, are recognized for their profession, not prefaced with a gender-specific title. This disparity is not just about semantics; it reflects deeper societal biases that seep into professional realms. Architects and interior designers are the only stakeholders in the traditionally male dominated construction industry to have reached gender parity.Yet, leadership positions, such as those within the Council of Architecture in India or the prestigious Pritzker Prize- the Oscars of architecture, reveal a stark gender imbalance, often sidelining female voices. Since its inception in 1973, all 12 Council of Architecture presidents have been men. Presently, of the 52 members that make up the council, only 8 are women.In the last 45 years, the prestigious Pritzker Prize has exclusively been awarded to a woman or group of women only twice.
As professionals, it's imperative to challenge these biases. And ask ourselves, why do we cling to these outdated labels.
The term "woman architect" should not exist in our vocabulary; the same way the term “man architect” sounds utterly preposterous.
Let’s strive to create a culture that celebrates talent, irrespective of gender, and foster an environment of equality and respect.
Share your thoughts and experiences on overcoming biases in architecture and interior design, in the comments section below.
Comments